A detailed list of projects reported in 2005/2006 is provided on the List of Projects Reported in 2005/2006
For the Complete Indicator Data Table, please download the pdf (148KB), pdf (20KB) and pdf (144KB).
| INDICATOR | DESCRIPTION | TARGET | 2005/2006 PERFORMANCE |
2004/2005 PERFORMANCE |
2003/2004 PERFORMANCE |
2002/2003 PERFORMANCE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban Water Cycle Management (see page 32) |
Percentage reduction in water consumption compared to the base case. | 40% 2008 |
37% | 43% | 31% | 22% |
| Percentage reduction in the mean annual load of total nitrogen (TN). | 45% 2008 |
35% | 21% | 19% | 15% | ||
| Percentage reduction in the mean annual load of total phosphorus (TP). | 45% 2008 |
45% | 38% | 33% | 26% | ||
| Percentage reduction in the mean annual load of total suspended solids (TSS). | 80% 2008 |
59% | 48% | 45% | No data | ||
| 2 | Moderate Income Housing (see page 37) |
Percentage of total yield (lots, house/land packages, dwelling units) that is delivered within the moderate income housing range. | 7.5% 2008 |
6.2% | 12% | 7% | 3% |
| 3 | Effectiveness of Community Consultation (see page 42) |
Percentage of Landcom projects where community consultation was done using a stakeholder consultation plan in accordance with Landcom’s Stakeholder Consultation Workbook. | 100% 2005 |
100% | 83% | 55.6% | 16.7% |
| 4 | Community Facilities (see page 37) |
Number of school sites provided. | NA | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Number of courts for playing sport delivered (e.g. tennis, basketball, multi-purpose sport, etc). | NA | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Number of community halls or community hall sites provided. | NA | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | ||
| Number of playgrounds provided. | NA | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | ||
| 5 | Welcome Programme (see page 37) |
Percentage of projects with more than 200 homesites that had a Welcome Programme. | 100% 2008 |
70% | 62% | 55% | 40% |
| Percentage of households that had a Welcome Programme visit within 2 weeks of home occupation. | 100% 2008 |
60% | 64% | 96% | 20% | ||
| 6 | Consumer Education on Sustainable Living (see page 42) |
Percentage of projects that have marketing material that includes consumer education on sustainable living. | 100% 2008 |
0 | 0 | 17% (2 out of 12 projects) |
0% |
| 7 | Reuse and Recycling of Construction and Demolition Materials (see page 33) |
Percentage of recovery (reuse and recycle) of total construction and demolition waste materials generated from civil works contracts delivered in that year. | 95% 2006 |
98% | 92% | 96% | 93% |
| Percentage of recovery (reuse and recycle) of total construction and demolition waste materials generated from building construction projects delivered in that year. | 76% 2014 |
No data | No data | No data | No data | ||
| 8 | Energy Efficiency (see page 33) |
Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, compared with base case, as per the Energy Smart Communities Policy. | 40% 2008 |
14.5% | 15.5% | 10% | 6.6% |
| 9 | Influencing Design (see page 38) |
Percentage of projects where Landcom influences the builders’ product by specifying design criteria. | NA | 75% (3 out of 4 projects) | 86% (6 out of 7 projects) |
100% (9 out of 9 projects) |
77% |
| 10 | Sustainable or Renewable Energy Supply (see page 34) |
Percentage of dwellings fitted with gas boosted solar hot water system. | 100% 2008 |
32% (53 out of 167) | 36% (91 out of 251) | 44% (99 out of 226) |
0% |
| Percentage of projects greater than 500 dwellings that include a component of renewable energy supply, either on-site or off-site, as per the Energy Smart Communities Policy. | 100% 2008 |
NA (Note 1) |
100% | NA | NA | ||
| 11 | Native Vegetation Management (see page 35) |
Loss of “high conservation significance” Endangered Ecological Communities. | No loss | 29.4 ha cleared 119.1 conserved |
14.0 ha cleared 30.9 ha conserved |
0.44 ha cleared 9 ha conserved |
NA |
| Loss of “moderate conservation significance” Endangered Ecological Communities. | No target | 59.09 ha cleared 16.4 ha conserved | 3.1 ha cleared 7.5 ha conserved |
8 ha cleared 2.3 ha conserved |
1 ha cleared 0.6 ha conserved |
||
| Loss of “low conservation significance” Endangered Ecological Communities. | No target | 65.4 ha cleared 18.6 ha conserved |
33.5 ha cleared 14.6 ha conserved |
11.9 ha cleared 6.6 ha conserved |
0.15 ha cleared4.83 ha conserved | ||
| Area of Endangered Ecological Communities replanted. | No target | 29.1 ha replanted | 63.3 ha | 9.5 ha | 10.4 ha | ||
| Percentage of projects where Endangered Ecological Communities or Threatened Species are found that have an appropriate Vegetation Management Plan. | 100% 2008 |
100% | 100% | 70% | 67% | ||
| Loss of native vegetation as potential habitat for Threatened Species. | No target | 201.1 ha cleared 179.5 ha conserved (Note 2) |
47.9 ha cleared 52.3 ha conserved |
16.4 ha cleared 10.9 ha conserved |
NA | ||
| 12 | Riparian Corridor Management (see page 36) |
Loss of riparian corridors for Category 1 – high significance streams. | No loss | NA | 0% | NA | NA |
| Greater than 40 m of riparian corridor from top of bank for Category 1 – high significance streams. | 100% 2008 |
NA | 100% | NA | NA | ||
| Length of in-stream breaks resulting from Landcom’s design for Category 1 – high significance streams. | No breaks | NA | 0 m | NA | NA | ||
| 20-30 m of riparian corridor from top of bank for Category 2 – moderate significance streams. | 100% 2008 |
100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| Length of in-stream breaks resulting from Landcom’s design for Category 2 – moderate significance streams. | No target | 0 m | 0 m | 0 m | 775 m realignment |
||
| 5-10 m setback from top of bank for Category 3 – low significance streams. | 100% 2008 |
100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| Length of in-stream breaks resulting from Landcom’s design for Category 3 – low significance streams. | No target | 460 m piping |
0 m | 150 m piping |
0 m | ||
| Provide appropriate Riparian Corridor Management Plans (RCMPs) for all Landcom projects where riparian land exists. | 100% 2004 |
100% | 60% | 43% | 50% | ||
| 13 | Conservation of Indigenous Heritage (see page 38) |
Percentage of projects with indigenous heritage issues where consultation occurred. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Percentage of significant indigenous heritage objects and places within Landcom projects that were conserved. | 100% | NA (Note 3) |
100% | 100% | NA | ||
| Percentage of projects with significant indigenous heritage issues that have a Conservation Management Plan developed. | 100% | NA (Note 3) |
100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| 14 | Conservation of Non-indigenous Heritage (see page 38) |
Percentage of significant heritage items conserved (except where unsafe or contaminated). | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 100% |
| Percentage of significant heritage places conserved. | 100% | NA (Note 3) |
NA | 100% | 100% | ||
| Percentage of projects with heritage listed items and places that will have a Heritage Conservation Management Plan. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| 15 | Regulatory Compliance (see page 43) |
Percentage of projects that have achieved full regulatory compliance with Protection of the Environment Operations Act and other environment, OH&S and planning legislation. | 100% | 73% | 93% | 100% | 100% |
| Percentage of contracts that have environmental audits carried out. | 100% | 45% | 64% | 85% | 21% | ||
| Percentage of civil environmental audit scores greater than 75%. | 100% | 80% | 100% | 100% | 89% | ||
| Percentage of builder environmental audit scores greater than 75%. | 100% | 11% (1 out of 9) | 43% | 27% | 25% | ||
| Percentage of civil environmental audit scores less than 50%. | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| Percentage of builder environmental audit scores less than 50%. | 0% | 89% | 0% | 31% | 50% | ||
| 16 | Profitability (see page 41) |
Sales revenue: Revenue is the total income Landcom receives including revenue from the sale of land, profit from joint ventures, project management services and miscellaneous items. | NA | $317,276,000 | $326,939,000 | $333,253,723 | $281,222,000 |
| 17 | Profitability (see page 41) |
Sales margin: Sales margin is calculated as sales revenue on land sales less the total cost of developing that land divided by the sales revenue. | NA | 38.9% | 45% | 48.8% | 51.2% |
| 18 | Profitability (see page 41) |
Return on sales: Return on sales is calculated as Landcom’s net operating profit after tax divided by the total revenue from the sale of land. | NA | 14% | 19.2% | 26.3% | 29.5% |
| 19 | Profitability (see page 41) |
EBIT: This is calculated as Landcom’s earnings before interest and tax. | NA | $72,610,000 | $99,315,000 | $132,180,000 | $127,130,000 |
| 20 | Profitability (see page 41) |
Return on equity: This is calculated as the earnings after tax divided by total shareholder equity. | NA | 12.3% | 17.2% | 24.6% | 26.1% |
| 21 | Profitability (see page 41) |
Return on total operating assets: This is calculated as Landcom’s profit after taxes divided by total operating assets. | NA | 6.4% | 8.4% | 15.1% | 16.5% |
| 22 | Financing Capacity (see page 41) |
Debt to equity ratio – measure of the amount of debt funding (net) as a percentage of equity utilised by Landcom as at the end of the financial year. | NA | 18.3% | 23.6% | 8.0% | 9.5% |
| 23 | Returns to Government (see page 41) |
Dividend and tax equivalent returned to the NSW Government during the reporting period. | NA | $61,738,000 | $73,518,000 | $87,978,000 | $83,081,000 |
| 24 | Returns to Government (see page 41) |
Total number of jobs created through Landcom’s activities. | NA | 6,050 | 7,868 | 5,270 | 4,470 |
| Total economic output generated from Landcom’s activities. | NA | $474,195,644 | $616,675,900 | $413,026,700 | $350,351,900 | ||
Note 1 The relevant projects masterplanned this year were not at a stage where the component of renewable energy could be defined.
Note 2 “Habitat” includes Endangered Ecological Communities where habitat is suitable for Threatened Species.
Note 3 While consultation had occurred on projects with potential indigenous and non-indigenous heritage values, the significance of objects and places had not been finalised during the reporting period.
NA Not applicable.
back to top