 |
| INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INTO OUR BUSINESS |
Advancing sustainable practices
and reporting has been one of Landcom’s annual “top
ten” corporate priorities since 2001. Landcom has embedded
TBL performance into its decision-making and into the fabric
of its business.
|
 |
| Through our projects, we strive to demonstrate benchmarks
in our key sustainability guiding principles, which are to: |
 |
(1) Deliver a sustainable quality of life.
(2) Conserve resources.
(3) Protect biodiversity.
(4) Minimise pollution. |
 |
| Our commitment to sustainable development means we endeavour
to ensure that our developments, products and services have
minimal adverse effect on the environment, the economy or the
community in which we operate. Landcom’s objective is
to move beyond a “minimum harm” philosophy by adopting
practices that add value and enhance community life, the environment
and the economy. |
 |
| For Landcom, the reason for implementing TBL decision-making
and reporting was consistent with its corporate vision of “creating
better communities”. Apart from achieving increased transparency,
increased trust among its stakeholders and an enhanced reputation
as a good corporate citizen, Landcom needed to prove its value
as a government-owned developer. It sought a clear strategy
for delivering measurable public benefits as a way of differentiating
itself from the private sector. |
 |
| Every Landcom project is monitored against sustainability
criteria and performance targets through the TBL reporting program.
The public reporting of Landcom’s performance against
these goals makes the Corporation more accountable by allowing
stakeholders to question results, to better understand the constraints
that Landcom faces and to challenge the Corporation to strive
harder. |
 |
| Landcom’s journey to TBL reporting has focused the entire
organisation not only on its performance, but also on its commitment
to sustainability. TBL reporting has made sustainability an
integral component of every project. It has become a critical
factor in the evaluation of Landcom’s performance as well
as that of its staff, consultants, contractors, builders and
developer partners. |
 |
| MAJOR CHALLENGE |
| Landcom acknowledges that we can
and will continue to improve our sustainability performance,
but we also know that our business has some impacts for which
we have no simple solutions. For example, urban development
affects biodiversity. Although we do our best to integrate conservation
into our developments, we have to deliver adequate and affordable
housing for the people of NSW. |
 |
| SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE TARGETS |
| The indicators selected for TBL reporting are not the only
criteria used by Landcom in practising sustainable development.
Instead, they are intended to give an overall picture of the
potentially significant impacts of our core business. The indicators
are subject to regular review to ensure that they remain relevant
to our core business. |
 |
| Landcom’s sustainability indicators were selected with
its key stakeholders during an extensive consultation program
conducted over 2001 and 2002. The selection was based on the
following criteria: |
 |
(1) The significance and relevance of the indicator to Landcom’s
core business.
(2) Whether the indicator enabled Landcom to demonstrate a change
in its performance over time.
(3) The ability of Landcom to exercise direct control or influence
over the indicator.
(4) Whether the indicator could be easily understood and communicated.
(5) Whether clear and measurable targets could be developed
to illustrate Landcom’s performance against the indicator.
(6) The likelihood of data being readily available to enable
the reporting of Landcom’s performance against the indicator
and the ability to retrieve accurate and meaningful data from
third-party sources (contractors and builders, etc). |
 |
| Landcom has conducted comprehensive research for a number
of the adopted performance indicators so that realistic and
measurable targets could be set. These research projects were
necessary to ensure that Landcom, while setting tough targets,
did not select milestones that imposed an undue burden on its
private-sector partners. The research also helped to provide
sufficient guidance to the industry on how to deliver desired
outcomes. |
 |
| PRODUCTS AND DELIVERY MECHANISMS |
| While Landcom is a property developer operating in a commercial
environment, it is not a builder. The selection of sustainability
indicators against which Landcom measures its performance has
been strongly influenced by its business products, the methods
Landcom employs to deliver these products and its ability to
exercise direct control over the business outcome. |
 |
| For the purposes of TBL data collection,
Landcom projects have been divided into two groups: |
 |
| (a) Projects where the end product delivered to the consumer
is “land”. The majority of this land is sold to
the public as individual house lots. Most industrial land is
sold to private business interests in the same way. Landcom
has little control over the final built form under these arrangements.
|
 |
| (b) Projects where the end product delivered to the consumer
is a dwelling (i.e. “built form” projects). Landcom
has more control over the built form under these arrangements,
in particular when it partners with another developer. Landcom
uses this additional control to promote its key sustainability
and design objectives. |
 |
| THE GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE |
| The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is an internationally
recognised group whose mission is to develop Sustainability
Reporting Guidelines (SRG) that are capable of universal application.
These guidelines are intended for public corporations wishing
to report on the economic, environmental and social dimensions
of their activities, products and services. Although the guidelines
are expected to be adopted increasingly by government and non-government
organisations, there are no sector specific guidelines for property
development. This is why Landcom decided to take its advice
and guidance on indicator selection from its key stakeholders.
|
 |
| While Landcom’s Sustainability Report is not strictly
in accordance with the requirements of the Sustainability Reporting
Guidelines, the Corporation has generally followed the principles
and criteria specified by Sustainability Reporting Guidelines.
A detailed comparison of Landcom’s TBL indicators against
GRI is provided on the enclosed CD-ROM. |
 |